Skip to content
Home » Zoology Jottings: A Frog at Butrint in southern Albania: What was it?

Zoology Jottings: A Frog at Butrint in southern Albania: What was it?


Having fun with the archaeological website at Butrint—Greek settlement, Roman metropolis, bishopric, Byzantine after which Venetian, however deserted within the late Center Ages—on the southern tip of Albania, larger treats of a herpetological sort have been in retailer. The flooded basements of the ruined buildings are house to 2 of the three species of terrapin in Europe, the European Pond Terrapin (Emys orbicularis) and the Balkan Terrapin (Mauremys rivulata). In one other damage we noticed a frog—the frog proven within the {photograph}. On the time (April 2010) I appeared it up within the 2nd version of the Collins Subject Information (2002 and 2004, London: Collins) and wrote it down as a Greek Marsh Frog, Rana balcanica, present in southern Albania, southern Macedonia, south-western Bulgaria and Greece. Nick Arnold, the e book’s writer, famous although that this species is also called Rana kurtmuelleri and ‘generally not thought to be distinct from Marsh Frog’, i.e. Rana ribibunda.

Frog photographed within the archaeological website of Butrint, April 2010

Because the early 2000s the water frogs have been moved into their very own genus, Pelophylax. Due to this fact the Marsh Frog turned Pelophylax ribibundus. The precise title balcanica for the Greek Marsh Frog aka Balkan Water Frog has additionally gone in favour of P. kurtmuelleri as a result of P. balcanica was shortly decided to be the identical species as that described by Gayda in 1940. Gayda’s title had precedence. In line with the The Eponym Dictionary of Amphibians (Beolens, Watkins, Grayson, 2013, Exeter: Pelagic Publishing) nothing appears to be recognized of who Kurt Müller was besides that he collected the holotype in Albania in 1938.

However is P. kurtmuelleri a legitimate species, distinct from Marsh Frog, P. ribibundus? One group has contended that it’s not, and seeing one member of that group was a major writer of the Subject Information to the Amphibians & Reptiles of Britain and Europe (Speybroeck, Beukema, Bok van der Voort, London: Bloomsbury) which was printed in 2016, it not shocking that the species isn’t listed apart from to notice it had been lumped into Marsh Frog.

Nonetheless, in truth, a lot of others have retained P. kurtmuelleri as a legitimate species. A key instance is the influential Amphibian Species of the World. That website accommodates a really transient abstract of, and a hyperlink to, every paper that has appeared on the species. For that motive, I’m not offering a listing of sources on the finish of this text.

I discover it very tough to resolve on the premise of present proof who is correct for the reason that standing of the water frogs of south-east Europe and south-western Asia is each confused and complicated. Nonetheless, I’m disquieted by those that dismiss research apart from these obtained utilizing the restricted evaluation of mitochondrial DNA (on this explicit case they’re these lumping the Balkan Water Frog into Marsh Frog) whereas dismissing organic proof which might point out the Balkan Water Frog needs to be break up from Marsh Frog.

It was Schneider, Sinsch and Sofianidou in 1993 who proposed that their balcanicus, later recognised as kurtmuelleri, needs to be recognised as a species distinct from the extra northerly ribibundus. The grounds for the break up was organic proof: the mating calls of the 2 kinds have been completely different. That is a part of the abstract of their paper:

The mating name of the lake frogs from Thrace resembles in all parameters that of the Rana ribibunda within the terra typica restricta (Guryev, CIS). Accordingly the lake frogs of jap Greece belong to R. ridibunda. The mating name of those lake frogs consists of 20 pulses/pulse group and of seven pulse teams/name on the typical. Most of Greece is inhabited by the second taxon, Rana balcanica sp. n. [P. kurtmuelleri] Its mating name is characterised by 27 pulses/pulse group and 4 pulse teams/name on common.

Along with the evaluation of the mating calls, small however statistically important variations have been evident in morphological options when the measurements they made have been subjected to discriminant evaluation.

One little bit of attainable proof to counsel the Balkan Water Frog is a legitimate species was raised by Schneider and his colleagues. Within the early Nineteen Eighties some work had been finished on crossing Marsh Frogs correct with water frogs from what was then southern Yugoslavia, which, they counsel, have been most likely, Balkan Water Frogs. The ensuing tadpoles had a excessive mortality and people who few that did survive to maturity, a low fertility, each indicative of hybridisation between two, somewhat than inside one, species.

Total, as a ‘lumper’ I can see why the ‘splitters’ have a case in recognising the Balkan Water Frog, Pelophylax kurtmuelleri, as a species, although much more analysis remains to be required.

However again to Butrint in 2010. Was the frog I photographed a Balkan Water Frog? There may be one other species of Pelophylax residing within the southern tip of Albania, the Epirus Water Frog, P. epeiroticus. Each species are extremely variable in look and hybrids between the 2 have been discovered. The Epirus Water Frog was solely described (by primarily the identical group that described balcanica (kurtmuelleri)) in 1984. A bunch of Slovakian and Czech zoologists have illustrated the variations in morphology and notably in coloration inside and between the species of water frogs that happen within the south-western Balkans. Trying on the pictures and studying the distinguishing options, it seems to me that the frog in my {photograph} (not ideally suited due to the reflections obscuring the tympanum) reveals traits of the Balkan Water Frog, P. kurtmuelleri. The habitat preferences of the Epirus Water Frog (which is seemingly frequent on the perimeters of the close by Lake Butrint) given within the 2016 Subject Information additionally point out that the flooded basement of an historic constructing are usually not prone to be inhabited by P. epeiroticus

I assumed a second go to to Butrint, this time in 2017 and in addition in mid-April, would afford me one other have a look at the frogs inside the archaeological website. The terrapins have been there however not a frog to be seen. The world I had seen the frog in 2010 was practically dry however for one nook which had a variety of giant tadpoles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *